The recent news of the reopening of the Garlasco case, nearly twenty years later, brings renewed attention to a sensitive and widespread issue in our country: the risk that initial investigations, often conducted under intense media and judicial pressure, may overlook key elements, or focus too early on a single lead, potentially neglecting alternative hypotheses.
Regardless of the guilt or innocence of Alberto Stasi, or of any new individuals who may emerge in the future, what this case highlights is the need for a broader, multidisciplinary, and more collaborative investigative approach.
A system that sometimes fails
This is not an indictment of law enforcement, who in most cases act with dedication and professionalism. However, it is undeniable that the traditional investigative system in Italy sometimes suffers from structural weaknesses:
- Investigations conducted in haste,
- narrazioni costruite attorno a un’unica ipotesi,
- Little openness to alternative scenarios,
- forte influenza dell’opinione pubblica e dei media.
In this context, the contribution of private investigative agencies, especially in the field of defense investigations, becomes crucial.
The importance of defense investigations
Under Italian law, Article 327-bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure allows defense attorneys to employ licensed private investigators to collect evidence and information useful to the defense. This synergy between law firms and investigative agencies is often the only practical way to reconstruct an alternative version of events, challenge the strength of the prosecution’s case, or simply fill the gaps of a flawed official investigation.
It is a delicate yet essential task, one that can make the difference between a just verdict and a miscarriage of justice.
When there is a lack of evidence
Too often in Italy, convictions (or arrests) occur in the absence of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, based instead on weak clues, subjective interpretations, or logically inconsistent narratives. In such cases, the intervention of a defense investigator can help restore focus to the factual reality, through:
- detailed reconstructions of the events,
- independent witness analysis,
- territorial and documentary investigations,
- OSINT and HUMINT research,
- verification of testimonial consistency and objective evidence.
Not to distort the truth, but to reach it.
The role of the media: amplifier or distorter?
Another factor that profoundly affects the outcome of investigations is media overexposure. In many cases, the media construct a public image of the alleged perpetrator long before any verdict is delivered.
This not only shapes public opinion but can also subconsciously influence those tasked with investigating and judging.
The sensationalism of crime, the need for a clear narrative and a "guilty party to present to the public," risks turning the investigation into a race for confirmation, rather than a genuine search for the truth.
A shift in mindset is needed
The Garlasco case is just one of many examples. There have been others, and there will be more. In far too many cases, it has emerged, often years later, that those convicted were innocent, or that critical elements were overlooked during the investigation.
The fact that, 18 years later, the guilt of a person who was arrested is being called into question represents a failure of the investigative and judicial system.
This is why, now more than ever, there is a need for a paradigm shift in investigative methods. We must acknowledge that the pursuit of truth cannot, and must not, be the exclusive domain of a single party. When conducted with professionalism and full respect for the law, private investigations do not obstruct justice: they complete it.
A truly just judicial system is one that embraces doubt as a tool and collaboration as a value. Working in synergy among law firms, investigative agencies, and law enforcement is not only possible: it is necessary.
It is the only way to prevent justice from becoming a blind mechanism, and truth from being sacrificed in the name of urgency or sensationalism.
Finally, we cannot forget that behind every miscarriage of justice is a person.
A person who has lost years of their life, relationships, reputation, and in many cases, their health. Isolation, humiliation, and the burden of media shaming are wounds that rarely heal.
Justice cannot give back the time that was stolen, but it can, and must, do everything possible to prevent it from being taken in the first place.
English 
Italian